CFPB Targets Fifth Third Bank Over Auto Loans

By Staff Writer July 11, 2024

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took action against repeat offender Fifth Third Bank for a range of illegal activities that would result in the bank paying $20 million in penalties in addition to paying redress to approximately 35,000 harmed consumers, including about 1,000 who had their cars repossessed. Specifically, the CFPB is ordering Fifth Third Bank to pay a $5 million penalty for forcing vehicle insurance onto borrowers who had coverage. The CFPB also filed a proposed court order that would require Fifth Third Bank to pay a $15 million penalty for opening fake accounts in the names of its customers. The proposed court order bans Fifth Third Bank from setting employee sales goals that incentivize fraudulently opening accounts.

“The CFPB has caught Fifth Third Bank illegally loading up auto loan bills with excessive charges, with almost 1,000 families losing their cars to repossession,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “We are ordering the senior executives and board of directors at Fifth Third to clean up these broken business practices or else face further consequences.”

Fifth Third Bancorp is a large bank holding company with $214 billion in assets headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Fifth Third Bank operates approximately 1,300 branches in 12 states, primarily in the Midwest and Southeast.

Today’s CFPB order, the first of the actions, addresses the CFPB’s findings that Fifth Third Bank illegally triggered repossessions and charged illegal fees by forcing loan borrowers into unnecessary and duplicative coverage policies. Between July 2011 and December 2020, more than 50% of the policies were charged to borrowers who had either always maintained their own coverage or obtained the requisite coverage within a 30-day timeframe of their prior policy lapsing.

For the discriminatory auto loan pricing action, Fifth Third Bank was ordered to pay $18 million to harmed Black and Hispanic borrowers. For the illegal credit card practices, the bank was ordered to pay $3 million to harmed consumers and a $500,000 penalty.

Rate this item
(0 votes)
Last modified on Wednesday, 17 July 2024 19:15